Syraqui Stupidity: Seymour Hersh: London Review of Books
Ukrainian Condition: Dmitry Orlov: ClubOrlov
Conditioning Ukrainians: Alexander Mercouris: The Saker
Urban Conditioning: Steve Waldman: Interfluidity
How Bad?: Scott Alexander: Slate Star Codex
The End Of Justice: Silver-Greenberg & Corkery: New York Times
Shattered Illusions: Ambrose Evans-Prichard: The Tellegraph
Monday, December 28, 2015
Tuesday, December 22, 2015
No More Illusions
Change
continues to accelerate. If human agency isn’t soon re-imposed on human consequences
we stand to exterminate ourselves, if we haven’t already, the consequences are
so delayed and the science so new we don’t yet really know. Enlightenment
cultural prejudices for materialism, humanism and a Christian conception of
progress have all played out to a point where each puts the others at peril.
Something happened some five centuries ago in the Western mind, now
manifesting the globe over that, if it fails to manifest positively in our
genes soon, will likely end us. As a species we are in a state of population
overshoot who’s deleterious affects surround us. The deluded souls at the
self-styled Climate Summit just concluded in Paris congratulate themselves on
progress, in the absence of evidence anything in particular has in fact been
done. In actuality, carbon release into the atmosphere continues to accelerate
with exponentially growing future consequences unchecked. Even as we charge our
atmosphere with solar heat, degrade our topsoil with fossil nitrogen and design
ever more energy intensive military implements of self extermination, our
chemical detritus, despite its marginality to our collective consciousness,
acidifies our oceans and deforms the endocrine systems of every living animal
on earth. If you buy the notion of "punctuated equilibrium" in evolutionary theory, it appears to be our only hope.
Like
almost all of earth’s life, we live off the energy of the sun. While there are
other beasts to have evolved technologies (hives, nests, webs etc.), we are
alone in owing our nature and cognitive capacity to a technology with which we
co evolved: the marshaling of fire transformed the solar harvest we consumed,
concentrating it enough to power our disproportionately large brains even as
they grew. Our minds grew in parallel to our perfecting of this refinement of
the very energy of life it self, human cognition is energy intensive. We have
transitioned as a species just recently through a second great technological
evolution for harnessing external power, but unlike the first, our planet
cannot absorb our activities in an ecological band suitable for our own
survival without our active self-management. Over the hundred thousand years
since our first unselfconscious energy-concentrating breakthrough, our external ecology became
increasingly stable even as our population grew. In the relative heartbeat of
the last two centuries, the fossil fuels era has disrupted that ecology so
dramatically that an evolution in our consciousness will be the only thing that
can save us. A constitutional self consciousness is now all that can save our ecology: we must categorically change our behavior and do it consciously. If this change fails to mark our genes, we’re unlikely to make it.
It
is a harsh reality we face, one of our own making, however unintentionally or
well intentional along the way. At the apex of the food chain, the cleverest
predator on the planet has as yet proven unable resist devouring its own
future. While we’ve always been just another beast, our communal nature has
repeatedly aggregated us into increasingly large societies, both horizontally
and vertically integrated. Tribe, city, state, nation, empire, the forms have
recurred like the bubbles forming of themselves at the bottom of a boiling pot,
tracing their trajectories through the roiling soup of history until, expanding
as they rise, the imperial bubbles eventually burst when they reach boundary
membrane of population pressure where the energy in the froth discharges into the void. Of
late these cultural bubbles, superheated with fossil energy are not just
poisoning the soup, but also irreparably changing its chemistry. We are
poisoning the land, air and water and charging each with man made artifacts
that tangle with the chemistry of life itself. If we fail in the near future to
take responsibility for these changes we are delivering, it is we who will be
driven into extinction along with most of the species we know and love most.
The
consequences are already in play, just not generally recognized as such. Those
paying attention will have noticed the last several fire seasons have been
exceptionally bad. Not just here, where California had the worst fire season
ever this year, following the worst prior last year, but around the world.
Exceptional weather with record wind, rain and heat is being recorded
everywhere. Reported as isolated events, no one wants to make the connections.
There have been courageous realists trying to communicate with us the
consequences of our actions now for two generations, but they remain isolated
and professionally pilloried by a class of their peers more susceptible to the
appeals of power than those of truth. In this instance power has taken the form
of money, offering these men of science career opportunities not available for
truth seekers. Nature’s sense of irony has bequeathed us a world where the
accelerated melting of the arctic and Greenland ice sheets has created an
abnormally temperate temporary micro-climate in the North Atlantic which
happens to provide the communicative infrastructure of the worlds current money
power an unusually pleasant climate dramatically at odds with that of the
remainder of the world. Nature chuckles as it asks us, "can you save yourselves?"
Friday, December 18, 2015
Sunday, December 13, 2015
Friday, December 11, 2015
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Friday, December 4, 2015
Monday, November 30, 2015
Tuesday, November 10, 2015
Links
Friday, November 6, 2015
Coup D'Etat Links
Judicial Coup D'Etat: Jared Thompson: Swarthmore
It Metastasizes To Deep State: Patrick Lang: Sic Sempre Tyrannis
Extrajudicial Constitutional Change: Gaius Publius: Naked Capitalism
Privatization Of The Fourth Estate: John Heltman: Washington Monthly
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 1: David DeGraw: Global Research
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 2: David DeGraw: Global Research
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 3: David DeGraw: Global Research
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 4: David DeGraw: Global Research
It Metastasizes To Deep State: Patrick Lang: Sic Sempre Tyrannis
Extrajudicial Constitutional Change: Gaius Publius: Naked Capitalism
Privatization Of The Fourth Estate: John Heltman: Washington Monthly
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 1: David DeGraw: Global Research
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 2: David DeGraw: Global Research
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 3: David DeGraw: Global Research
Financial Coup D'Etat Part 4: David DeGraw: Global Research
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Environment Links
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Links
Social Fission: Daniel Little: Understanding Society
Pick The Right Parents: Pete Dolack: Systemic Disorder
Techpocalypse: Sarah Lacy: Pando
Alternative Legitimacy: Eric Fish: The Atlantic
Sourcing Syria: Patrick Lang: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Distorting Lens Of Wealth: Valerie Strauss: Washington Post
Stoicism: Larry Wallace: Aeon
Pick The Right Parents: Pete Dolack: Systemic Disorder
Techpocalypse: Sarah Lacy: Pando
Alternative Legitimacy: Eric Fish: The Atlantic
Sourcing Syria: Patrick Lang: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Distorting Lens Of Wealth: Valerie Strauss: Washington Post
Stoicism: Larry Wallace: Aeon
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Monday, October 19, 2015
Links
MIC institutionalizes Agnatology: Tom Engelhardt: Tom Dispatch
Spend To Solve, Part 1: Michael Hoexter: New Economic Perspectives
Spend To Solve, Part 2: Michael Hoexter: New Economic Perspectives
Autopsy Of The Autopsy: John Helmer: Naked Capitalism
Speaking For The House: James Robenalt: Raw Story
Spend To Solve, Part 1: Michael Hoexter: New Economic Perspectives
Spend To Solve, Part 2: Michael Hoexter: New Economic Perspectives
Autopsy Of The Autopsy: John Helmer: Naked Capitalism
Speaking For The House: James Robenalt: Raw Story
Monday, October 12, 2015
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
Tuesday, October 6, 2015
Links
Mechanics Of Monetary Mystification: Steve Randy Waldman: Interfluidity
Melt Down Missing From Media: Robert Hunziker: Counterpunch
Continuing Cabal: Paul Street: Counterpunch
U.S. vs Democracy : Alexander Main & Dan Beeton: Jacobin
Bouncing Borders: b: Moon Of Alabama
Jousting Jihadis: Patrick Lang: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Melt Down Missing From Media: Robert Hunziker: Counterpunch
Continuing Cabal: Paul Street: Counterpunch
U.S. vs Democracy : Alexander Main & Dan Beeton: Jacobin
Bouncing Borders: b: Moon Of Alabama
Jousting Jihadis: Patrick Lang: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Monday, September 21, 2015
Links
Friday, September 11, 2015
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
What Is Wealth?
Wealth is what makes us well in the world. It is the existential necessities of food and shelter followed closely by community. We are social animals and life means little without the sharing we do with family, friends and society. Even less without food and shelter. In the urban world most of us now inhabit these existential necessities are entirely or largely mediated by money: we live in a market society where the means of subsistence are accessed only indirectly, through a complex and stratified division of labor bequeathed by industrialization. Even our private lives have become monetized with our parents in assisted living and our children in day care. Ever more of our existence is mediated by the division of labor and channeled through markets by the psychological pull of money.
Money looks like wealth because we can exchange it for necessities as well as luxuries. That money makes no distinction between the two highlights its amorality. Money is morally neutral, real wealth is not. In fact, I'll argue here that real wealth is necessarily moral as it is what makes life good, it provides moral value. Money is a tool that like all others lacks moral agency: it is neither good nor bad on its own and achieves what moral meaning it can only through the agency of the people that use it. Real wealth is existential goods that propagate our genes into the future. Wealth is what is necessary for the long term prosperity both of ourselves individually, and our species. Where it fails on either count, it is not real wealth, at best it is extraction which can parade as wealth only to the extent it escapes scrutiny while it wastes what is real beyond view.
Most economic activity is purely extractive and cannot earn the moral appellation, wealth. This activity and its product is none the less commonly considered wealth despite its destruction of individual and species wide futures through its waste of what is real, living and valuable. This destructiveness usually happens beyond the immediate environment where money falsely parades as wealth. How and why is this self destructive delusion sustained? And how does money maintain the penumbra of wealth's positive association despite its destructive effects?
This is tied up in the illusory value of money where we let it stand in metaphorically for wealth. It is an artifact of our fast, heuristic thinking eliding the complex meanings of the systems we have built, stretching them over emotional templates evolved for an environment these systems have replaced. We elide our existential dependence on life, the ecology from which we actually feed, and seize the abstraction at hand, money that delivers it to our table. To understand how and why this happens wherever civilization obtains lets look at the usage of the word "wealth".
From Merriam-Webster on line:
WEALTH, noun \'welth also 'weltth\:
- a large amount of money and possessions
- the value of all the property, possessions, and money that someone or something has
- a large amount or number
Full Definition of wealth:
- obsolete: Weal, Welfare
- abundance of valuable material possessions or resources
- abundant supply: profusion
- a. all property that has a money value or an exchange value, b. all material objects that have economic utility; especially: the stock of useful goods having economic value in existence at any one time
Lets flesh these out:
WEALTH:
- a large amount of money and possessions: This is the practical day to day usage to which civilization puts the word. A large amount of money or possessions is what we think of when we hear the word and underlying questions of what value is and why don't enter out thoughts. As supported by the institutions of a money issuing central bank, courts and their executive agencies, governance and the resulting markets that call forth what goods and services we need as we need them, this definition is a good short hand for those who have wealth and deploy it into civilizations infrastructures.
- the value of all the property, possessions, and money that someone or something has: Is our next most common usage, essentially a summary of an individuals or institution's endowment of 1. above.
a large amount or number: Having taken the implicit value of the two definitions above at their face, a large quantity of anything is by virtue of its number alone, "wealth".
Full Definition of wealth:
- obsolete: Weal, Welfare: Now things get interesting. Again from Merriam-Webster, weal is a sound, healthy or prosperous state: well-being. Quite different this, nothing about money at all. Further, as a second meaning, now doubly obsolete: body politic, commonweal. Then, welfare, the state of doing well especially in respect to good fortune, happiness, well-being, or prosperity.
- abundance of valuable material possessions or resources: in the above context, this would be shelter and food, of the healthy, sustainable variety. This is the very essence of real wealth, where an individual can command it in security or where for collective security it is commanded by a society, an amalgam of our fellow beasts for which we are obviously socially evolved despite our selfish predilections otherwise.
- abundant supply: profusion: This abundant supply or profusion becomes a commutative part of the word usage, porting the idea elsewhere as metaphor.
- a. all property that has a money value or an exchange value, b. all material objects that have economic utility; especially: the stock of useful goods having economic value in existence at any one time
wealth: And finally we collapse back into our habitual, civilized usage: money and other "values" as measured by money.
Our caloric weal is the most useful entry point into understanding what real wealth is. We all need around 2,000 calories a day of food. Within that, there needs to be a particular distribution of nutrients. The calories alone aren't enough, it is the balance of nutrients that make a diet healthy, which is, from
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Wednesday, September 2, 2015
Friday, August 28, 2015
Refugee Links
Middle East Refugees: Liz Sly: Washington Post
Making Refugees: b: Moon Of Alabama
For Decency Sake, Refugees, Not Migrants: Boehler & Pecanha: New York Times
Where Is The Compassion?: Tom Porteous: CNN
Syrian Refugees: Syrianrefugees.eu
Climate Refugees: Elliot Negin: EcoWatch
The Perverse Economics Of Labor/Refugee Migration: Rick :Flip Chart Fairy Tales
Making Refugees: b: Moon Of Alabama
For Decency Sake, Refugees, Not Migrants: Boehler & Pecanha: New York Times
Where Is The Compassion?: Tom Porteous: CNN
Syrian Refugees: Syrianrefugees.eu
Climate Refugees: Elliot Negin: EcoWatch
The Perverse Economics Of Labor/Refugee Migration: Rick :Flip Chart Fairy Tales
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
Links
Growth Fails: Gail Tverberg: Our Finite World
1/3 Of US Children In Poverty: Staff: Shadow Proof
Against Charity: Mathew Snow: Jacobin
Friends Like These: Medea Benjamin: Foreign Policy In Focus
Somehow Missing Maidan: Andrew Cockburn: Harpers
John Galt's False Consciousness: Slavoj Zizek: Salon
Deport The Derelicts: Andy Borowitz: New Yorker
1/3 Of US Children In Poverty: Staff: Shadow Proof
Against Charity: Mathew Snow: Jacobin
Friends Like These: Medea Benjamin: Foreign Policy In Focus
Somehow Missing Maidan: Andrew Cockburn: Harpers
John Galt's False Consciousness: Slavoj Zizek: Salon
Deport The Derelicts: Andy Borowitz: New Yorker
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Links
Trump, Good and Bad: Ian Welsh: Mark Ames
Proving the Democratic Party is the party of empty symbolism, in an act of empty symbolism the Democratic Party is dumping some empty symbols: Jonathan Martin: New York Times
Trumps Real Target?:Brent Budowsky: Observer
Change I Could Believe In: Marilyne Tolle: Bankunderground
Change We Will Struggle With: Eric Holthaus: Rolling Stone
Proving the Democratic Party is the party of empty symbolism, in an act of empty symbolism the Democratic Party is dumping some empty symbols: Jonathan Martin: New York Times
Trumps Real Target?:Brent Budowsky: Observer
Change I Could Believe In: Marilyne Tolle: Bankunderground
Change We Will Struggle With: Eric Holthaus: Rolling Stone
Sunday, August 2, 2015
Money Power
These posts again and again I fear have failed to impress people with the dangerousness of money power to anywhere near the degree they should distrust it. The weaponization of finance as deployed by the US in the "Global War On Terror" (GWOT), first against the failing states where Al Qaeda festered, then against Iran and Venezuela and now against Russia, has evolved since 2001 into a bold and entirely unselfconscious financial imperialism that struts and pontificates a hollow morality in the absence of similarly lethal opposing alternatives, alternatives it systematically undermines wherever it divines their bloom. Is it any wonder the Pope himself has weighed in against it? While the Bretton Woods system which underpinned the prosperity both here and abroad in the years 1946 to 1971 was subtlety transformed with Nixons shift to fiat money, the politics of the system retained it's New Deal ethos until the Supreme Court threw the 2000 election and Imperialism finally came home to roost. The decomposing residue of prestige earned with the post war global roll out of the New Deal, an effort sustained mostly in resistance to the totalitarian perversion Stalin imposed on juvenile communism in Russia, is now sloughing off, revealing the reptile skin of the anti-humanist leviathan Western Capitalism has become.
Without the Soviet sustenance of its better angles this system has proven incapable of containing the psychotic avarice of those who lust for power through money. Let's take this moment to build a new mythology from the tragedy Greece has become. Through this clear manifestation of the money psychosis, where the lethal power of money is on full display, let the liquidated cradle of democracy stand as a parable on the evils of money power: the democratically elected government of a supposedly sovereign European nation, which nation first practiced representative government, has been publicly, deliberately and humiliatingly enslaved by a claque of unelected bankers subject to an assortment of socio-pathologies that assuage their consciences for what may turn out to be genocidal acts: at a minimum they are political acts, which to achieve results, casually threaten a Greek genocide. This is precisely the banal evil of which Hanna Arendt warned: collective rectitude in adherence to an ideology physically and temporally removed from its deadly consequences leaving those consequences conveniently and willfully ignored.
By denying liquidity to a modern industrial society, these bankers have threatened that population with extermination by starvation and in so
Friday, July 31, 2015
Links
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Sunday, July 19, 2015
Not Yet Checkmate, But Close, Links
What's happening in Greece makes Crassus look dignified. Moderate citizens assuming they live in a European Civilization have now been disabused. A situation so fluid now exists that no one can say how it will resolve, but the bad faith with regard to representative government in the Euro zone is now on open display. Neither the electorates of Greece nor Europe, nor the emperor have had their final say, but that Finland can block a deal or that NATO can force one both belie all democratic pretenses.
It is not to late for Europe to save itself, but the precipice is near. If Eurocrats continue to terrorize the victims of corruption rather than the perpetrators, as they have done now in Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus and Greece while threatening the Italians and French, men with guns will take from them such power as they have. At present it is the comparatively benign guns of NATO insisting on a civilizational deal, but should this fail more radical alternatives are preparing themselves in the wings.
The Eurocrats seem quite happy with the men with guns they've supported and who support them in Finland, Spain and Latvia, but at some point men with guns will not brook bureaucratic power and will turn. And this will complete the cycle. What Latvia, Lithuania, Greece, Spain and Portugal all have in common is their recent military dictatorships. While this governmental structure has formally expired in each instance, it's residue of power constitutionally unscripted lives on and is what we like to call "corruption" when it is not found in our allies. Tariq Ali summarizes below.
Athens Dairy: Tariq Ali: LRB
Plus Ca Change: Neil Clark: RT
It is not to late for Europe to save itself, but the precipice is near. If Eurocrats continue to terrorize the victims of corruption rather than the perpetrators, as they have done now in Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus and Greece while threatening the Italians and French, men with guns will take from them such power as they have. At present it is the comparatively benign guns of NATO insisting on a civilizational deal, but should this fail more radical alternatives are preparing themselves in the wings.
The Eurocrats seem quite happy with the men with guns they've supported and who support them in Finland, Spain and Latvia, but at some point men with guns will not brook bureaucratic power and will turn. And this will complete the cycle. What Latvia, Lithuania, Greece, Spain and Portugal all have in common is their recent military dictatorships. While this governmental structure has formally expired in each instance, it's residue of power constitutionally unscripted lives on and is what we like to call "corruption" when it is not found in our allies. Tariq Ali summarizes below.
Athens Dairy: Tariq Ali: LRB
Plus Ca Change: Neil Clark: RT
Saturday, July 18, 2015
Links
Greek Lives Don't Mater: Ed Walker: EmptyWheel
Setting Them Up For Slaughter: Raul Ilargi: The Automatic Earth
Neo-Liberal Seas: Ian Urbina: New York Times
It's Not Just Fox News: Thomas Frank: Salon
Fixing Money: Adrian Kuzminski: ClubOrolov
Money is an IOU from civilization. Those who would prefer gold would prefer that they owe nothing to the civilization that feeds them and wish they could extract the richness that is civilization and carry pieces of it away for themselves.
In their folly they cannot see that any piece they pull free and abscond with is worthless once absented from civilization.
Gold, art, real estate, and any financial assets are worthless without the dense network of human bonds that give them what value they have within consensual networks of exchange, only within the constraints of civilization does this so called wealth bear fruit.
War, an acute absence of civilization, is the perennial reminder that it is civilization that lends value to wealth, not the other way around, need we be reminded?
Setting Them Up For Slaughter: Raul Ilargi: The Automatic Earth
Neo-Liberal Seas: Ian Urbina: New York Times
It's Not Just Fox News: Thomas Frank: Salon
Fixing Money: Adrian Kuzminski: ClubOrolov
Money is an IOU from civilization. Those who would prefer gold would prefer that they owe nothing to the civilization that feeds them and wish they could extract the richness that is civilization and carry pieces of it away for themselves.
In their folly they cannot see that any piece they pull free and abscond with is worthless once absented from civilization.
Gold, art, real estate, and any financial assets are worthless without the dense network of human bonds that give them what value they have within consensual networks of exchange, only within the constraints of civilization does this so called wealth bear fruit.
War, an acute absence of civilization, is the perennial reminder that it is civilization that lends value to wealth, not the other way around, need we be reminded?
Friday, July 10, 2015
Sunday, July 5, 2015
Reality Bites Links
Sunday, June 28, 2015
Saturday, June 27, 2015
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Friday, June 12, 2015
Links
Bubble From The Left: Golem XIV
Bubble From The Right: David Stockman: Contra Corner
Stand Up (against TPP): Gaius Publius; Naked Capitalism
Sit Down (Greece): Leonid Bershidsky: Bloomberg
Fight (ISIS): McFate, et al.: ISW
Fight (Ukraine): AFP-JIJI: Japan Times
Fight: (Saudi Arabia): Gary Brecher: Pando
Where It All Leads: John Michael Greer: Archdruid Report
Bubble From The Right: David Stockman: Contra Corner
Stand Up (against TPP): Gaius Publius; Naked Capitalism
Sit Down (Greece): Leonid Bershidsky: Bloomberg
Fight (ISIS): McFate, et al.: ISW
Fight (Ukraine): AFP-JIJI: Japan Times
Fight: (Saudi Arabia): Gary Brecher: Pando
Where It All Leads: John Michael Greer: Archdruid Report
Sunday, June 7, 2015
Links
My Big Fat Greek Crisis: Satyajit Das: Naked Capitalism
Consequences Of Austerity: Amartya Sen: New Statesman
Darkness Descends On Europe: Joseph Stiglitz: Project Syndicate
Bernanke's Blindness: Steve Waldman: Interfluidity
Manufacturing Equality: TooMuchOnLine
Stripping States Rights: Openureyes: BleedingHeartland
Skynet Ethics: Stuart Russell: Nature
Putin's Opinions: Luciano Fontana: Vineyard Of The Saker
The Era Of Breakdown: John Michael Greer: The Archdruid Report
Growing Up With Slaves: Samuel Clemens: DelancyPlace
Consequences Of Austerity: Amartya Sen: New Statesman
Darkness Descends On Europe: Joseph Stiglitz: Project Syndicate
Bernanke's Blindness: Steve Waldman: Interfluidity
Manufacturing Equality: TooMuchOnLine
Stripping States Rights: Openureyes: BleedingHeartland
Skynet Ethics: Stuart Russell: Nature
Putin's Opinions: Luciano Fontana: Vineyard Of The Saker
The Era Of Breakdown: John Michael Greer: The Archdruid Report
Growing Up With Slaves: Samuel Clemens: DelancyPlace
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Links
Manufacturing Delusions: Bruce Bartlett: SSRN
If We Weren't Deluded: Tim Smeeding: Lane Kenworthy
Ukrainian Delusions: Michael Hudson: Naked Capitalism
American Delusions: Michael Klare: Naked Capitalism
Delusions Of Power : Mark Ames: Pando
Delusions Of Terror: Bruce Schneier: Schneier On Security
My Delusion: Gaius Publius: Naked Capitalism
If We Weren't Deluded: Tim Smeeding: Lane Kenworthy
Ukrainian Delusions: Michael Hudson: Naked Capitalism
American Delusions: Michael Klare: Naked Capitalism
Delusions Of Power : Mark Ames: Pando
Delusions Of Terror: Bruce Schneier: Schneier On Security
My Delusion: Gaius Publius: Naked Capitalism
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Links
Ignoring Israel On Nuking Iran: Philip Weiss: MondoWeiss
Ignoring Jeremy Hammond: Kit O'Connell:Mint Press
Ignoring Iraq: Patrick Lang: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Ignoring Al Queda: Jon Schwarz: The Intercept
Ignoring Trade Failures: Elizabeth Warren: Huffington Post
Ignoring Unhappiness: William Davies: Transformation
Programmed To Ignore: Tom Murphy: Do The Math
Ignoring Jeremy Hammond: Kit O'Connell:Mint Press
Ignoring Iraq: Patrick Lang: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Ignoring Al Queda: Jon Schwarz: The Intercept
Ignoring Trade Failures: Elizabeth Warren: Huffington Post
Ignoring Unhappiness: William Davies: Transformation
Programmed To Ignore: Tom Murphy: Do The Math
Friday, May 15, 2015
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Thomas Friedman
A friend, in discussion of the proposed TPP, referred me to this column by Thomas Friedman, what follows is my response.
This is more or less where I stand on trade, that it's good in theory but only marginal in importance as compared to maintaining full employment, which we haven't. The most salient feature of the proposed treaty about which Thomas Friedman (TF) is opining is its secrecy: no one really knows what is in it except for the corporate lawyers who wrote each of its thousands of clauses, but none of them really have an umbrella understanding of the whole. I support fair trade, which is different from free in that "free" has so many meanings as to be an empty signifier: if TPP were fair what would be the point of its secrecy? That it is secrete states a clearly as one could hope that its contents would be disagreeable to someone. That someone would not be who wrote it. Who do you suppose might not like it if they could see it?
So before tackling Friedman's column I suppose I have to clarify where I'm coming from and the interpretive schema I use to evaluate a column like this. It is to my eyes is an almost infinite Russian doll of nested assumptions. Then I want to look at what case can be made for the current TPP proposal.
Only then will I return to TF and his rhetoric.
Part 1
Morality is what we owe one another directly in our face to face relations, ethics is what we owe one another through the operation of our systems, through our social, economic and political interfaces. Such interfaces, beginning with language and mathematics, are man made artifacts I'll be referring to by their ironic quality as infrastructures. These infrastructures are systems that to the extent they work appear to be natural, like the air we breathe. Words or numbers just seem to be there, the irony is that although they are our inventions, they change our underlying realities so extremely as to defamiliarize us instinctively with our resulting environment.
Even as we make them, they re-make us: as electricity, telephony, highways and aqueducts have made our cities an environment alien from the savannas on which we evolved, language and math have made our social spaces even more remote from that of our evolutionary progenitors. Language is a symbolic system that lets us say anything, math is an alternative system where everything reduces to zero. Money, which will be central to my argument, aggregates the two into a confounding system that scrambles our ethics and morals. Our
This is more or less where I stand on trade, that it's good in theory but only marginal in importance as compared to maintaining full employment, which we haven't. The most salient feature of the proposed treaty about which Thomas Friedman (TF) is opining is its secrecy: no one really knows what is in it except for the corporate lawyers who wrote each of its thousands of clauses, but none of them really have an umbrella understanding of the whole. I support fair trade, which is different from free in that "free" has so many meanings as to be an empty signifier: if TPP were fair what would be the point of its secrecy? That it is secrete states a clearly as one could hope that its contents would be disagreeable to someone. That someone would not be who wrote it. Who do you suppose might not like it if they could see it?
So before tackling Friedman's column I suppose I have to clarify where I'm coming from and the interpretive schema I use to evaluate a column like this. It is to my eyes is an almost infinite Russian doll of nested assumptions. Then I want to look at what case can be made for the current TPP proposal.
Only then will I return to TF and his rhetoric.
Part 1
Morality is what we owe one another directly in our face to face relations, ethics is what we owe one another through the operation of our systems, through our social, economic and political interfaces. Such interfaces, beginning with language and mathematics, are man made artifacts I'll be referring to by their ironic quality as infrastructures. These infrastructures are systems that to the extent they work appear to be natural, like the air we breathe. Words or numbers just seem to be there, the irony is that although they are our inventions, they change our underlying realities so extremely as to defamiliarize us instinctively with our resulting environment.
Even as we make them, they re-make us: as electricity, telephony, highways and aqueducts have made our cities an environment alien from the savannas on which we evolved, language and math have made our social spaces even more remote from that of our evolutionary progenitors. Language is a symbolic system that lets us say anything, math is an alternative system where everything reduces to zero. Money, which will be central to my argument, aggregates the two into a confounding system that scrambles our ethics and morals. Our
Monday, May 4, 2015
Links
Milk From A Dead Sow: Raul Ilargi: Automatic Earth
Grantham On The Sow: Jeremy Grantham: MacroBusiness
Russia Sans Sows Milk: Andy Tully: OilPrice
The Look Of The Sow From Russia: Rostislave Ischenko: Vineyard Of The Saker
Second Guessing Niccolo: Quentin Skinner: NYRB
Socialism In America: Bernie Sanders: Naked Capitalism
Joy Of Gravity: Surf All Beaches: BusinessInsider
Grantham On The Sow: Jeremy Grantham: MacroBusiness
Russia Sans Sows Milk: Andy Tully: OilPrice
The Look Of The Sow From Russia: Rostislave Ischenko: Vineyard Of The Saker
Second Guessing Niccolo: Quentin Skinner: NYRB
Socialism In America: Bernie Sanders: Naked Capitalism
Joy Of Gravity: Surf All Beaches: BusinessInsider
Sunday, May 3, 2015
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Hacking The President
Today's stories in the Times and Guardian about hackers, supposedly Russian, who were able to access the President's emails, among other things, and penetrate fairly deeply into State Department computers fastidiously miss the central point of both the hacks and the public disclosures of them. The President and the State Department are secondary and only loosely defended. Real power now lies elsewhere and the importance of legacy institutions like the Presidency or State Department are found in the domestic theater of "legitimacy". The real power centers, wherever they are, are secure, or are they? At least they think they are, whatever and wherever they are. These stories "surface" to use what residual legitimacy the Presidency and State Departments have to validate the powers of new and secret institutions who thus advertise their necessity with their own failures.
I don't pretend to know where real power now lies in our erstwhile system of representative government, but I speculate that it is diffuse, increasingly distributed and more and more transparently at cross purposes. In my last long post, I made reference in the third section to Philip Bobbitt's conception of the "Market State". The Market State is in his schema the organic successor to the decaying Welfare State and a fair representation of what our system appears to think it is trying to become. With the Citizen's United ruling, this system inverted the interpretive armature for US jurisprudence to codify a new representative constituency for who's benefit the cannon of US law would need to be re-interpreted. Rights newly extended to business entities who's executives have access to enormous cash flows combine with the market codification of politics since the 70s to usher in a governmental structure where citizen's legacy voting rights are legally circumscribed to choices explicitly funded by the individuals at the helm of these newly enfranchised corporate entities giving those individuals at the helm uniquely large and unconstrained power.
We witness now, in the US, a sub surface scrum amongst the elite to lock down or improve existing advantages and subsidies. Real tensions are building between business sectors with conflicting interests, but thus far the focus has been on extending market protections these incumbents enjoy into the satraps of our empire. The obvious current manifestation is our President's parsimony with the truth in trying to sell the TPP. But this obvious, headline fact combines uncomfortably with the adjacent front page fact that he's been hacked. This presents two possibilities, both of which may be to some extent true: first is that the real center of power is so little concerned with the Presidents efficacy and influence as to leave him unguarded; the second is that hubris is so high within the Surveillance State that our cyber spooks have lost a step to Russia's, or perhaps someone else's.
Again in that last long post I speculated about a corporation that succeeded in offering to its staff all that a state can offer. To engender a similar "patriotism" needing, in order to secure it's continued access to the physical resources that allowed it to make such an offer, ultimately to physically embody itself on a territory, becoming by that act, in fact a State. With my second proposition above, I believe what we are seeing is precisely this kind of move on the part of Vladimir Putin's government which had been content to manage the Russian people's needs to the interests of its home grown oligarchs until it became clear on the Maidan last year that the Western Empire was insisting on their fealty to it.
Having experienced directly the commodification of all that's valuable in life with the Shock Doctrine era of Yeltsin, the Russian people have been happy to have a slightly more nationalistic oligarchy looking to butter its own bread. But the weaponization of finance, indeed money itself through SWIFT, has, along with our activity in Ukraine and eastern Europe, focused the Russian President's mind: he is Chairman of the Board of the greater Russian oligarchy, why not consolidate the corporate state into that company that can command patriotism up to the willingness to fight and die, why not restore nationalist Russia? While the oligarchs, like our own over here, have been content to accommodate themselves to the dictates of the American imperial system, the Russian state has now formally refused to do so.
I have no romantic notions about the architect of Grozny's ruin in the Kremlin, in fact in devastation he executed with dispatch there what we've blundered through these last ten years in Baghdad and Tripoli, but precisely that clarity with regard to his own interests suggests he is more likely to strengthen the social capital that is the comparative advantage of every civilization to strengthen his own position in both it and the world. Our "richer take all" version, driven as it is by a semi-religious faith in markets, can not as yet see that the plunder by which the rich grow richer is not a national virtue. Putin's Russia struggles with capital flight where it's plutocracy tries to expatriate its loot into the broader pool of loot that is increasingly all that remains of our western social capital while we lure it here, building it palaces in the sky.
But a nationalist Russia concerned with power will sooner provide for the fitness of its people, their health and well being, than will our delusional Market State where every etiology leads to money alone where people without it are seen as nothing more than costs. In extremis patriots will not require money to fight, the Market States mercenaries always will. So while it appears that Vladimir Putin is turning Russia Inc. back into Russia proper, Barack Obama has been reduced to corporate figurehead for USA Inc., a global corporation run by a board made up of its financial/military industrial complex and operated for only their benefit. But the Market State vision of benefit as money and money alone is, by monetizing all value, destroying the civilizational infrastructure that underpins it. Only by seeing people rather than money as the purpose of society can a civilization stand. Money will not buy the loyalty that only real community can, and without that even Presidents will be hacked.
I don't pretend to know where real power now lies in our erstwhile system of representative government, but I speculate that it is diffuse, increasingly distributed and more and more transparently at cross purposes. In my last long post, I made reference in the third section to Philip Bobbitt's conception of the "Market State". The Market State is in his schema the organic successor to the decaying Welfare State and a fair representation of what our system appears to think it is trying to become. With the Citizen's United ruling, this system inverted the interpretive armature for US jurisprudence to codify a new representative constituency for who's benefit the cannon of US law would need to be re-interpreted. Rights newly extended to business entities who's executives have access to enormous cash flows combine with the market codification of politics since the 70s to usher in a governmental structure where citizen's legacy voting rights are legally circumscribed to choices explicitly funded by the individuals at the helm of these newly enfranchised corporate entities giving those individuals at the helm uniquely large and unconstrained power.
We witness now, in the US, a sub surface scrum amongst the elite to lock down or improve existing advantages and subsidies. Real tensions are building between business sectors with conflicting interests, but thus far the focus has been on extending market protections these incumbents enjoy into the satraps of our empire. The obvious current manifestation is our President's parsimony with the truth in trying to sell the TPP. But this obvious, headline fact combines uncomfortably with the adjacent front page fact that he's been hacked. This presents two possibilities, both of which may be to some extent true: first is that the real center of power is so little concerned with the Presidents efficacy and influence as to leave him unguarded; the second is that hubris is so high within the Surveillance State that our cyber spooks have lost a step to Russia's, or perhaps someone else's.
Again in that last long post I speculated about a corporation that succeeded in offering to its staff all that a state can offer. To engender a similar "patriotism" needing, in order to secure it's continued access to the physical resources that allowed it to make such an offer, ultimately to physically embody itself on a territory, becoming by that act, in fact a State. With my second proposition above, I believe what we are seeing is precisely this kind of move on the part of Vladimir Putin's government which had been content to manage the Russian people's needs to the interests of its home grown oligarchs until it became clear on the Maidan last year that the Western Empire was insisting on their fealty to it.
Having experienced directly the commodification of all that's valuable in life with the Shock Doctrine era of Yeltsin, the Russian people have been happy to have a slightly more nationalistic oligarchy looking to butter its own bread. But the weaponization of finance, indeed money itself through SWIFT, has, along with our activity in Ukraine and eastern Europe, focused the Russian President's mind: he is Chairman of the Board of the greater Russian oligarchy, why not consolidate the corporate state into that company that can command patriotism up to the willingness to fight and die, why not restore nationalist Russia? While the oligarchs, like our own over here, have been content to accommodate themselves to the dictates of the American imperial system, the Russian state has now formally refused to do so.
I have no romantic notions about the architect of Grozny's ruin in the Kremlin, in fact in devastation he executed with dispatch there what we've blundered through these last ten years in Baghdad and Tripoli, but precisely that clarity with regard to his own interests suggests he is more likely to strengthen the social capital that is the comparative advantage of every civilization to strengthen his own position in both it and the world. Our "richer take all" version, driven as it is by a semi-religious faith in markets, can not as yet see that the plunder by which the rich grow richer is not a national virtue. Putin's Russia struggles with capital flight where it's plutocracy tries to expatriate its loot into the broader pool of loot that is increasingly all that remains of our western social capital while we lure it here, building it palaces in the sky.
But a nationalist Russia concerned with power will sooner provide for the fitness of its people, their health and well being, than will our delusional Market State where every etiology leads to money alone where people without it are seen as nothing more than costs. In extremis patriots will not require money to fight, the Market States mercenaries always will. So while it appears that Vladimir Putin is turning Russia Inc. back into Russia proper, Barack Obama has been reduced to corporate figurehead for USA Inc., a global corporation run by a board made up of its financial/military industrial complex and operated for only their benefit. But the Market State vision of benefit as money and money alone is, by monetizing all value, destroying the civilizational infrastructure that underpins it. Only by seeing people rather than money as the purpose of society can a civilization stand. Money will not buy the loyalty that only real community can, and without that even Presidents will be hacked.
Saturday, April 25, 2015
Saturday, April 18, 2015
Saturday, April 11, 2015
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Monday, April 6, 2015
Links
Saudi Infrastructure At Risk: Ambrose Evans_Pritchard: Telegraph
And It's Cheery Tale!: Gary Brecher: Pando
Methane Makes The Mainstream: Chris Mooney: Washington Post
$traws On The Camel's Back: Marcy Wheeler: EmptyWheel
Pugnacious Putin?: Colin Chilcoat: Oilprice
Rising Tide Sinks Most Boats: Pavlina Tcherneva: Levy Institute
And It's Cheery Tale!: Gary Brecher: Pando
Methane Makes The Mainstream: Chris Mooney: Washington Post
$traws On The Camel's Back: Marcy Wheeler: EmptyWheel
Pugnacious Putin?: Colin Chilcoat: Oilprice
Rising Tide Sinks Most Boats: Pavlina Tcherneva: Levy Institute
Saturday, March 28, 2015
Links
Philosophical Newspeak: Paul Greiner: Consortium News
Putin's Haircut: Raul Illargi: Automatic Earth
What We Have In Lieu Of A Left: James Petras: Petras.LaHanie.org
Sectoral Balances Matter: Frances Cappola: Credit Writedowns
A Well Regulated Militia: Patrick Durusau: Another Word For It reminds me of this
The Untouchables: Marcy Wheeler: Emptywheel
Putin's Haircut: Raul Illargi: Automatic Earth
What We Have In Lieu Of A Left: James Petras: Petras.LaHanie.org
Sectoral Balances Matter: Frances Cappola: Credit Writedowns
A Well Regulated Militia: Patrick Durusau: Another Word For It reminds me of this
The Untouchables: Marcy Wheeler: Emptywheel
Sunday, March 22, 2015
Links
Lapavitsas-Varoufakis: Sebastian Budgen: Jacobin
What Germany Owes Greece: Manfred Ertel: Spiegel
What That Has Led To: Maria Katsounaki: Ekathimerini
Capitalism Of Slavery: Doug Muder: WeeklySift
Presence Of Absence: Gary Brecher: Pando
The Post Constitutional Order: Tom Engelhardt: Naked Capitalism
What Germany Owes Greece: Manfred Ertel: Spiegel
What That Has Led To: Maria Katsounaki: Ekathimerini
Capitalism Of Slavery: Doug Muder: WeeklySift
Presence Of Absence: Gary Brecher: Pando
The Post Constitutional Order: Tom Engelhardt: Naked Capitalism
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Strange Times Links
Euro Morality Charade: Michael Shedlock: Global Economic Analysis
Devouring Social Capital: Glen Pearson
Digesting Social Capital: Robert Reich
Society Sans Capital: Fabius Maximus
Capital Sans Society: Yves Smith: Naked Capitalism
Schism In DC: Robert Parry: Consortium News
Schism In Moscow: Lowe & Bush: Reuters
Weirdness In China: Michael Shedlock: Mish's
End Of Empire: Ian Welsh
Devouring Social Capital: Glen Pearson
Digesting Social Capital: Robert Reich
Society Sans Capital: Fabius Maximus
Capital Sans Society: Yves Smith: Naked Capitalism
Schism In DC: Robert Parry: Consortium News
Schism In Moscow: Lowe & Bush: Reuters
Weirdness In China: Michael Shedlock: Mish's
End Of Empire: Ian Welsh
Monday, March 9, 2015
Links
Death Of A Class: Edward McClelland: Salon
Morals vs Ethics: Ian Welsh
The Shield Of Morals From Ethics: David Greaber: Financial Times
Bureaucratic Moores Law: Yasha Levin: Naked Capitalism
What Are We Talking About?: Daniel Little: Understanding Society
In Power, Or Prisoner Of Praetorean's?: b: Moon Of Alabama
Morals vs Ethics: Ian Welsh
The Shield Of Morals From Ethics: David Greaber: Financial Times
Bureaucratic Moores Law: Yasha Levin: Naked Capitalism
What Are We Talking About?: Daniel Little: Understanding Society
In Power, Or Prisoner Of Praetorean's?: b: Moon Of Alabama
Saturday, March 7, 2015
Links
Paine: Sean Monahan: Jacobin
CEOpen Season: John Robb: GlobalGuerrillas
Greed vs Investment: Yves Smith: Naked Capitalism
Why Putin's Popular: Jana Bakunina: New Statesman
I would have put #2 first
EU Cognitive Dissonance: Mikhail Kazin: The Saker
Peak Meaninglessnmes: John Michael Greer: The Archdruid Report
Tuttle/Buttle: Andrew Cockburn: Counter Punch
CEOpen Season: John Robb: GlobalGuerrillas
Greed vs Investment: Yves Smith: Naked Capitalism
Why Putin's Popular: Jana Bakunina: New Statesman
I would have put #2 first
EU Cognitive Dissonance: Mikhail Kazin: The Saker
Peak Meaninglessnmes: John Michael Greer: The Archdruid Report
Tuttle/Buttle: Andrew Cockburn: Counter Punch
Monday, March 2, 2015
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Links
Society Is Structure: Daniel Little: Understanding Society
How Structure Fails People: Gary Brecher: Pando
How Structure Fails States: Michael Hudson: Real News Network
Calthrate Gun Hypothesis?: Will Stewart: Daily Mail
What Follows: Henao & Borenstein: AP
Resilience Of Life: Maddie Stone: Gizmodo
GMO Consensus?: Timothy Weise: TripleCrisis
A Genus Of Debt: John Weeks: Real News Network
How Structure Fails People: Gary Brecher: Pando
How Structure Fails States: Michael Hudson: Real News Network
Calthrate Gun Hypothesis?: Will Stewart: Daily Mail
What Follows: Henao & Borenstein: AP
Resilience Of Life: Maddie Stone: Gizmodo
GMO Consensus?: Timothy Weise: TripleCrisis
A Genus Of Debt: John Weeks: Real News Network
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Euro Foie Gras
From Wikipedia: "Foie gras (i/ˌfwɑːˈɡrɑː/, French for "fat liver") is a food product made of the liver of a duck or goose that has been specially fattened. By French law,[1] foie gras is defined as the liver of a duck or goose fattened byforce-feeding corn with a feeding tube, a process also known as gavage. In Spain[2] and other countries outside of France it is occasionally produced using natural feeding.[3] Ducks are force-fed twice a day for 12.5 days and geese three times a day for around 17 days. Ducks are typically slaughtered at 100 days and geese at 112 days.[4]"
The contract of adhesion the "Institutions" of the Eurozone are in process of imposing on Greece is nothing less than financial gavage: fiat money conjured by the totalitarian theocracy ECB is force fed to a nominally sovereign state to engorge its liver into the only delicacy in the body of state suitable for consumption by the Eurozone Finance Ministers and like minded "Institutions." The remainder of the carcass will be butchered and sold at market.
The treasury in combination with a central bank is the motivational power center of a sovereign state. It is the place where the decisions of state get boiled down to the pure nutrient of money deployed to the larger body to energize its actions. I have above referred to Greece's treasury as its "liver", the place where nutrient is separated from waste, the one fed on to the body and the other excreted. But to do that I've italicized nominally with regard to sovereign. The States of the Eurozone, while they have treasuries, have abdicated the central bank function to the theocracy in Brussels, making them something less than sovereign: as Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothshild said in 1791, "Allow me to issue and control a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."
Beyond this, the nations suffering from the tender gavage of the ECB have another important thing in common. Nominally sovereign and democratic since independence in 1916, Ireland has never shaken the economic yolk of its historical antagonist across the Struth na Moile. This lack of real control of its economic fate is what joins Ireland with our other three subjects where this reality is a good deal more obvious. Greece, Portugal and Spain were all well within living memory military dictatorships. Military dictatorships quite like hierarchy and serve to preserve a particular elite, an oligarchy, at the expense of the larger societies they actually, not literally, command. In shaking free of this overtly exploitative governmental form, our three remaining subjects all agreed to nominal republican, that is to say loosely, democratic forms of government: they are representative governments until such point as legislation might impinge on the conserved privilege of that elite, at which point power vanishes.
In a healthy State, the "liver" distills political direction from an elected executive. With money as both incentive and constraint, it distributes the peoples' money, for that and nothing else is what fiat money is, both taxing and spending to motivate or inhibit human action along the vectors expressed in executive decision and authorized by an elected body representative of the citizenry. Taxation is the tool by which the healthy liver drains away toxins in the system and spending is the way it promotes health. Our variously corrupted nominal sovereigns have all experienced a marked inability to collect taxes from their old oligarchy allowing a toxic build up. This inevitably increases the malign power of that oligarchy over time. What Syriza ran into at the start of this week was the concerted efforts of the combined oligarchies to maintain their toxic, protected position. Should Greece be allowed to reform, to actually tax its oligarchs, why, no oligarchy anywhere could possibly be safe. The blunt terms imposed on Athens could not make more clear that the force feeding must continue until the goose is ready to slaughter, and slaughter it will be because there is manifestly no way this goose can survive.
The body is to be "privatized" sold off more or less at auction. The liver, however, suspended hydroponically, will continue to be force fed Euros because the delicate stomachs of Northern Europe's banks can't digest anything else. The only food they can still metabolize is the false fat of bailout cash tube fed through the livers of bankrupt and dying nations. Only Euro Foie Gras can sustain the monumental and lethal gluttony of the oligarchy that has seized Rothshild's money power in Europe. If you pull the gavage tubes from these geese, the only way to preserve the oligarchy will be to stuff it with Euros directly from the ECB which would reveal once and for all that fiat is conjured from the trust of society, and that banks no longer actually do anything to deserve it, the trust or the money. Syriza? Podemos? Front National? Who? Someone, somewhere soon must pull the feeding tubes from the ECB's geese and let Western Finance finally purge itself of the NeoLiberal lard that has bloated its body these last thirty five years.
The contract of adhesion the "Institutions" of the Eurozone are in process of imposing on Greece is nothing less than financial gavage: fiat money conjured by the totalitarian theocracy ECB is force fed to a nominally sovereign state to engorge its liver into the only delicacy in the body of state suitable for consumption by the Eurozone Finance Ministers and like minded "Institutions." The remainder of the carcass will be butchered and sold at market.
The treasury in combination with a central bank is the motivational power center of a sovereign state. It is the place where the decisions of state get boiled down to the pure nutrient of money deployed to the larger body to energize its actions. I have above referred to Greece's treasury as its "liver", the place where nutrient is separated from waste, the one fed on to the body and the other excreted. But to do that I've italicized nominally with regard to sovereign. The States of the Eurozone, while they have treasuries, have abdicated the central bank function to the theocracy in Brussels, making them something less than sovereign: as Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothshild said in 1791, "Allow me to issue and control a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."
Beyond this, the nations suffering from the tender gavage of the ECB have another important thing in common. Nominally sovereign and democratic since independence in 1916, Ireland has never shaken the economic yolk of its historical antagonist across the Struth na Moile. This lack of real control of its economic fate is what joins Ireland with our other three subjects where this reality is a good deal more obvious. Greece, Portugal and Spain were all well within living memory military dictatorships. Military dictatorships quite like hierarchy and serve to preserve a particular elite, an oligarchy, at the expense of the larger societies they actually, not literally, command. In shaking free of this overtly exploitative governmental form, our three remaining subjects all agreed to nominal republican, that is to say loosely, democratic forms of government: they are representative governments until such point as legislation might impinge on the conserved privilege of that elite, at which point power vanishes.
In a healthy State, the "liver" distills political direction from an elected executive. With money as both incentive and constraint, it distributes the peoples' money, for that and nothing else is what fiat money is, both taxing and spending to motivate or inhibit human action along the vectors expressed in executive decision and authorized by an elected body representative of the citizenry. Taxation is the tool by which the healthy liver drains away toxins in the system and spending is the way it promotes health. Our variously corrupted nominal sovereigns have all experienced a marked inability to collect taxes from their old oligarchy allowing a toxic build up. This inevitably increases the malign power of that oligarchy over time. What Syriza ran into at the start of this week was the concerted efforts of the combined oligarchies to maintain their toxic, protected position. Should Greece be allowed to reform, to actually tax its oligarchs, why, no oligarchy anywhere could possibly be safe. The blunt terms imposed on Athens could not make more clear that the force feeding must continue until the goose is ready to slaughter, and slaughter it will be because there is manifestly no way this goose can survive.
The body is to be "privatized" sold off more or less at auction. The liver, however, suspended hydroponically, will continue to be force fed Euros because the delicate stomachs of Northern Europe's banks can't digest anything else. The only food they can still metabolize is the false fat of bailout cash tube fed through the livers of bankrupt and dying nations. Only Euro Foie Gras can sustain the monumental and lethal gluttony of the oligarchy that has seized Rothshild's money power in Europe. If you pull the gavage tubes from these geese, the only way to preserve the oligarchy will be to stuff it with Euros directly from the ECB which would reveal once and for all that fiat is conjured from the trust of society, and that banks no longer actually do anything to deserve it, the trust or the money. Syriza? Podemos? Front National? Who? Someone, somewhere soon must pull the feeding tubes from the ECB's geese and let Western Finance finally purge itself of the NeoLiberal lard that has bloated its body these last thirty five years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)